Is the "Chinese ChatGPT" actually better than the $20/month model you're using? Let's look at the math, the benchmarks, and the vibe.
If you felt a disturbance in the force last week, it wasn't just your Wi-Fi acting up. It was the sound of Nvidia's stock dropping because a small Chinese lab just released an AI model that rivals GPT-4—and they're giving it away for free.
Enter DeepSeek R1.
It’s currently #1 on the App Store. It’s significantly cheaper than OpenAI. And for developers practicing the art of vibe coding, it might just be the holy grail.
But is it safe? Is it actually smart? Or is this just another hype cycle? Let’s dive in.
DeepSeek R1 isn't just another chatbot. It's a reasoning model (similar to OpenAI’s o1 or "Strawberry"). This means when you ask it a complex math problem or a tricky coding question, it doesn't just guess the next word—it "thinks" (Chain of Thought) before it answers.
But here’s the kicker: Efficiency.
DeepSeek claims to have trained this beast using less than 10% of the compute power OpenAI uses.
The result? A model that is faster, cheaper, and arguably smarter at code generation.
Let’s get straight to the numbers. If you are looking at slashing API costs, this table will make you weep tears of joy.
| Feature | OpenAI o1 (Preview) | DeepSeek R1 | The Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost (Input) | $15.00 / 1M tokens | $0.14 / 1M tokens | DeepSeek (100x cheaper) |
| Cost (Output) | $60.00 / 1M tokens | $0.28 / 1M tokens | DeepSeek (200x cheaper) |
| Math Score (AIME) | 79.2% | 79.8% | Tie |
| Coding (Codeforces) | 96.3% | 96.3% | Tie |
| Censorship | High (Safety Rails) | Low (Open Weights) | DeepSeek (for freedom) |
| Privacy | Enterprise Grade | Questionable (Servers in China) | OpenAI |
(Source: DeepSeek GitHub Benchmarks)
"It costs $0.28 to do what OpenAI charges $60 for. That isn't competition; that's a massacre."
You’re probably thinking: "It's from China. Is it spying on my code?"
This is a valid concern. DeepSeek is compliant with Chinese regulations. If you use their web chat or API, your data is technically processed on their servers.
However, there is a loophole.
Because DeepSeek R1 is Open Source (MIT License), you can download the weights and run it locally (or on a private cloud).
If you are working on classified government tech, stick to Azure OpenAI. If you are building a Top 10 Metaverse Game for 2026, DeepSeek is likely fine.
For those of us obsessed with vibe coding—where you describe the app and the AI writes the code—DeepSeek is a game changer because of its massive context window and reasoning capabilities.
Here is the 3-step setup:
ollama.com and install it.ollama run deepseek-r1Now you have a GPT-4 class coding assistant running on your laptop, offline, for free.
DeepSeek R1 hasn't killed OpenAI yet—ChatGPT still has the best UX and voice mode. But for developers, students, and power users, the gap has closed.
When you can get autonomous AI agents running for pennies on the dollar, loyalty to a $20/month subscription starts to fade.
My advice? Cancel your Plus subscription for one month. Try DeepSeek. If you survive, you just saved yourself $240 a year.
1. Is DeepSeek R1 better than ChatGPT? For coding and math, yes, it often matches or beats GPT-4o. For creative writing or cultural nuance, ChatGPT is still superior.
2. Can I use DeepSeek for commercial projects? Yes, the model is MIT licensed, meaning you can use it freely for commercial applications.
3. Why is DeepSeek so cheap? They optimized the architecture (Mixture-of-Experts) to use fewer chips, drastically lowering the electricity and hardware cost to run it.
4. Does it work with image generation like Nano Banana? No, DeepSeek R1 is text-only. For images, check out my guide on Nano Banana Tips.